What Khat Teaches Ethiopia About a Future Cannabis Export Trade

Photo by Gilmer Diaz Estela via Pexels.

Walk through the export ledgers at Ethiopia's Ministry of Trade and you won't find a single line item for cannabis. There is no licensed grower, no registered exporter, no tax bracket for it anywhere in the system. And yet Ethiopia already has a real-world pilot program for what happens when a psychoactive plant crop tries to become a serious export commodity, and it isn't cannabis at all -- it's khat, the leafy stimulant chewed across the Horn of Africa and beyond for generations.

Khat's numbers tell a story worth paying attention to. Export revenue hit a record USD 402 million in 2021, Ethiopia's best year ever for the crop. Then it slid to USD 391 million in 2022, and cratered to just USD 248 million in 2023 -- a drop of nearly USD 154 million in two years, or roughly 38 percent off the peak. That's not a rounding error. That's a commodity losing its footing fast, and the reasons why -- contraband, taxation gaps, and the whims of a single dominant export market -- are exactly the pressures any future cannabis trade would run into on day one.

Cannabis itself remains a different story entirely. It's still classified as a narcotic substance under a 1996 proclamation, and possession or sale can carry up to ten years in prison. Meanwhile, a 2019 estimate pegged Ethiopia's domestic cannabis market potential at nearly USD 10 billion, built on an estimated user base skewing heavily young. That's the gap worth sitting with: a market that size, existing entirely outside the law, next door to a legal cash crop that's now demonstrating in real time just how brutal export markets can be even once you've cleared the legal hurdle. Khat's recent troubles aren't a tangent -- they're the closest thing Ethiopia has to a dress rehearsal.

Cannabis in Ethiopia: Still Firmly Illegal

Photo by Abenezer Muluken via Pexels.

Ethiopia's cannabis law hasn't moved in three decades, and there's no sign that's about to change. The controlling statute is the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Control and Regulation Proclamation of 1996, which folded cannabis into the country's narcotics schedule alongside harder drugs. Under the criminal code provisions tied to that proclamation, possessing, transporting, selling, or even storing cannabis can draw up to ten years in prison plus a monetary fine, with sentencing scaled to quantity and whether trafficking is involved.

Two institutions carry the enforcement load. The Ethiopian Food and Drug Administration and Control Authority handles the regulatory and scheduling side -- deciding what counts as a controlled substance and how violations are classified -- while the Ethiopian Federal Police Counter-Narcotic Division does the street-level work: seizures, arrests, and interdiction at borders and markets. Between them, the two agencies form a fairly conventional prohibition apparatus, similar in structure to narcotics enforcement in many East African states.

What makes Ethiopia's situation a little unusual is the archaeological record sitting underneath all of this. Researchers have documented cannabis use in the Horn of Africa region going back well over a thousand years, with residue evidence turning up in ritual and burial contexts far predating the modern state. That history hasn't bought cannabis any political goodwill, though. Unlike khat, which has centuries of open cultural use and an established legal export trade to show for it, cannabis carries none of that legislative momentum. As of 2026, there's no bill in front of parliament, no ministerial working group, and no public policy signal suggesting reconsideration of either medical or recreational cannabis law. The plant's deep regional history and its total absence from current policy conversation sit side by side, largely disconnected from one another.

A USD 10 Billion Market That Exists Only on Paper

Photo by Rick Proctor via Unsplash.

The number that gets repeated most often in any discussion of Ethiopian cannabis potential is USD 10 billion. It comes from a 2019 African Regional Hemp and Cannabis Report produced by a Washington-based research institute, which modeled Ethiopia's domestic cannabis market -- legal or not -- at close to that figure. The same report estimated roughly 7.1 million cannabis users inside the country, with usage rates skewing noticeably toward younger Ethiopians.

Numbers like that tend to circulate long after their shelf life has expired, and this one is now several years removed from the market conditions that produced it. More importantly, it was never tethered to any actual legal framework capable of turning that theoretical demand into taxed, tracked trade revenue. A market estimate built on illicit consumption patterns doesn't translate automatically into export earnings -- it takes licensing regimes, cultivation standards, quality control infrastructure, and export logistics that Ethiopia has never built for this particular plant.

This is precisely the gap that dogged khat for much of its early commercial history, before it had established, formal export channels to Somalia, Djibouti, and beyond. Demand existed for generations before the trade around it became structured, licensed, and taxable in any consistent way. Cannabis in Ethiopia is sitting at that same starting line today, except further back -- khat at least had centuries of open cultivation and regional trade custom to build formal channels on top of. Any future cannabis export industry would be starting from literally nothing: no licensing precedent, no quality-grading system, no established buyer relationships. That's the real value of looking at khat right now. It isn't a perfect analogue, but it's the only crop in the country that has already run the experiment of turning a culturally embedded plant into a formal export line, and its more recent numbers are the more useful reference point than a seven-year-old market projection.

Khat's Boom and Bust: The Numbers

Ethiopia's khat export revenue held relatively steady in 2021-2022 before dropping sharply in 2023, falling from around $391 million to just $248 million—a decline of over 35%.

Khat's trajectory over the past five years reads like a cautionary chart for anyone thinking a legal cannabis trade would be an automatic windfall. Export revenue climbed to an all-time high of USD 402 million in 2021. The following year it edged down to USD 391 million, still a strong number. Then in 2023 it fell off a cliff to USD 248 million -- a decline of more than a third from the peak, in just two years.

This isn't a marginal crop for Ethiopia. More than 3.8 million farmers cultivate khat across upward of 300,000 hectares, producing over 2.4 million quintals annually. That's a huge base of smallholder livelihoods riding on export performance, which makes the recent decline more than an abstract trade statistic -- it's income loss spread across millions of rural households.

The trend hasn't reversed. Parliamentary reporting from spring 2026 showed officials expecting more than USD 13.6 million in revenue from February khat exports alone, based on projected volumes. Actual exports came in at 858 tonnes, landing about USD 4 million short of target -- roughly 11 percent below the same month in 2025. That's a fresh data point showing the slide is continuing, not just a one-time post-pandemic correction.

What makes this worth flagging as a structural problem rather than bad luck is the contrast with Ethiopia's broader trade performance. The country posted record overall export revenue of USD 6.7 billion in the first eight months of the fiscal year -- a strong macroeconomic showing. Khat sliding backward against that kind of national export growth tells you the problem is specific to khat itself: how it's taxed, how it's smuggled, and who it's sold to. That specificity is exactly what makes it a useful preview for cannabis rather than a generic story about Ethiopian trade struggling broadly.

Contraband, Double Taxation, and a Market Legal Exporters Can't Win

Photo by Lipot Repaszky via Pexels.

Exporters who deal in khat point to one culprit above all others for the recent revenue drop: contraband. Illicit trading networks, operating outside licensing and tax channels, have effectively captured large chunks of the market that legal exporters used to serve. Because khat degrades quickly and needs to move fast from farm to buyer, informal traders who skip paperwork and border checkpoints can often get product to market faster and cheaper than anyone playing by the rules.

Price is where this really bites. Legal khat exporters in Ethiopia face what amounts to double taxation -- duties and levies applied at multiple points in the supply chain -- while contraband traders simply skip those costs entirely. That difference shows up directly in what a buyer pays, and buyers, unsurprisingly, gravitate toward the cheaper option regardless of its legal status. A licensed exporter trying to compete on price against an untaxed black-market seller is fighting with one hand tied behind their back, and khat's recent numbers suggest they're losing that fight.

This is the single biggest structural risk that a future legal cannabis export program would inherit wholesale. Passing a law that legalizes cultivation and export doesn't automatically create a functioning legal market -- it creates a legal channel that then has to out-compete whatever illicit channel already exists, usually with a built-in cost disadvantage. Enforcement capacity ends up mattering just as much as the legislation itself. Without effective controls at borders and in domestic markets, legalization on paper is no guarantee that trade actually flows through legal, taxed channels in practice.

It's also worth noting this isn't a khat-specific quirk of Ethiopian trade policy. Oilseed, cereal, and livestock exporters report similar pressure from informal trading networks and layered taxation, suggesting this is a systemic feature of how Ethiopian agricultural export markets function rather than something unique to one plant. Any cannabis framework built without addressing that systemic weakness head-on would likely reproduce it.

Geopolitics Can Shut Down a Market Overnight

Photo by Ali Mkumbwa via Unsplash.

Perhaps the sharpest lesson khat offers has nothing to do with domestic policy at all -- it's about how exposed a single-market export crop can be to another country's politics. Somalia has historically bought close to 80 percent of Ethiopia's total khat exports, making it by a wide margin the dominant destination market. When diplomatic relations between the two governments soured, that trade didn't just slow down -- it was pushed almost entirely underground, converting what had been a formal, taxed export flow into exactly the kind of contraband channel described above.

Somalia's government has also introduced a quota system capping khat imports at around 100,000 kilograms per day, a hard ceiling that throttles legal export volume no matter how much demand exists on either side of the border. That's a policy lever entirely outside Ethiopian control, capable of capping revenue regardless of production capacity or market appetite.

Israel offers a smaller but equally telling example. Khat exports there dropped from 52.3 tons worth USD 1.8 million to just 21.3 tons worth USD 746,000, a decline tied to regional instability rather than anything happening on the production side in Ethiopia. In both cases, the trade wasn't undone by a change in Ethiopian law or Ethiopian growing conditions -- it was undone by decisions and circumstances entirely outside the country's hands.

A future cannabis export industry, even one built on a fully legal, well-regulated foundation, would carry the same exposure. Concentrate sales in one or two dominant destination countries and you've built a business that can lose most of its market overnight if that country's politics shift, its government changes a quota, or a regional conflict flares up. The clearest structural lesson here isn't about cultivation or licensing at all -- it's that diversifying export destinations from the outset is not optional risk management, it's the only real insurance against a single geopolitical event wiping out most of an industry's revenue in a single year.

None of this requires Ethiopia to legalize cannabis to be useful. Khat is already running the experiment, in real time, with real farmers and real export revenue on the line, and the results so far argue for building enforcement capacity and export diversification into any future cannabis framework from the very beginning -- not treating them as problems to solve later once the industry is already up and running.

The USD 10 billion market estimate is a good illustration of why that sequencing matters. A large theoretical market means very little without the institutional capacity to actually tax it, license it, and defend it against contraband and against the decisions of hostile or unstable neighbors. Khat had generations of cultural legitimacy and established trade routes behind it, and it's still losing ground to smugglers and shifting diplomatic winds. Cannabis would be starting that fight from a much weaker position, with no existing legal export infrastructure at all.

If Ethiopia ever does move to legalize cannabis for export, khat's fall from a record USD 402 million peak in 2021 to USD 248 million just two years later shouldn't be filed away as an unusual rough patch. It should be treated as the baseline risk scenario -- the kind of decline a comparable crop can suffer even with decades of legal precedent behind it. Planning around anything rosier than that would be planning around a version of the market that Ethiopia's own recent history says doesn't exist.