Rescheduling to Schedule III: What It Means for Cannabis Leases

August 13, 2026

Photo by Artful Homes via Pexels.

Cannabis operators renegotiating leases this spring are running into a problem their landlords haven't caught up on yet: the federal government just changed how their businesses get taxed, and most property owners have no idea. Since April 28, 2026, when the DEA's downscheduling order hit the Federal Register, state-licensed medical marijuana businesses have been operating under a fundamentally different set of financial rules than they were a month earlier. Rent, once an undeductible expense buried under Section 280E, is now just rent again -- for some operators, anyway.

The catch is that this shift is a lot narrower than the headlines suggested when it happened. Rescheduling didn't move all cannabis to Schedule III. It moved two specific categories: marijuana in an FDA-approved drug product, and marijuana tied to a state medical marijuana license. Recreational-only cannabis, with no medical license attached, is still sitting on Schedule I, exactly where it's been since 1970. That split is now showing up in real estate negotiations, where tenants, landlords, and their attorneys are picking apart lease language -- personal guarantees, rent covenants, permitted-use clauses -- that was written for a world where every cannabis tenant was presumptively a federal criminal. A lot of that language no longer matches reality for medical operators, and everyone involved is still figuring out what to do about it. Meanwhile, a much bigger ruling on adult-use rescheduling is still pending after DEA hearings wrapped up July 15, 2026, which means the ground could shift again before landlords finish adjusting to the first change.

How We Got Here: From Executive Order to Federal Register

Photo by Nataliya Vaitkevich via Pexels.

This didn't happen overnight, and it didn't happen through Congress. On December 18, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14370, directing the Department of Justice to expedite its long-stalled review of marijuana's scheduling status -- a process that had been sitting idle since the Biden administration kicked off a rescheduling review back in 2022. That order put a clock on an agency process that had dragged for years without resolution.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the actual downscheduling order on April 23, 2026. The order moved two narrowly defined categories of marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III: marijuana contained in an FDA-approved drug product, and marijuana subject to a state-issued medical marijuana license. It became effective five days later, on April 28, 2026, when it was published in the Federal Register -- the procedural moment that made it enforceable law rather than just an announcement.

What didn't move is just as important as what did. Recreational cannabis sold without any tie to a state medical license program remains Schedule I, full stop. For businesses operating in adult-use markets, or dual-licensed businesses trying to figure out which of their revenue streams qualifies, this has created a genuine gray zone -- one that landlords, lenders, and tenants are all still sorting through months after the effective date. A separate, much larger process is underway on top of this: DEA hearings examining whether to reschedule cannabis more broadly, including adult-use, ran from June 29 to July 15, 2026. No ruling has come out of that proceeding yet, and until it does, the industry is operating under this split-status arrangement -- medical relief, recreational limbo -- indefinitely.

Why 280E Changes the Math on Rent

Photo by Leeloo The First via Pexels.

The real financial impact of rescheduling runs through Section 280E of the federal tax code, a provision written in the 1980s to stop drug traffickers from deducting business expenses. Because marijuana was Schedule I (and Schedule II wouldn't have helped either), state-licensed cannabis businesses got caught in that net for decades -- unable to deduct rent, payroll, or most other ordinary costs the way any other business could. Moving to Schedule III lifts that bar entirely for the categories now covered, since 280E only applies to Schedule I and II substances.

Joe Puglise, CEO of Florida-based Fino Cannabis, told MJBizDaily that being able to deduct rent for the first time is by far the biggest immediate impact he's seeing from rescheduling -- bigger than any regulatory or licensing change. He estimates the savings land somewhere in the range of 15% to 20%, depending on how a given company is structured. That's not a rounding error. For an operator paying six or seven figures a year in rent across a cultivation facility, processing space, and retail locations, that's real money dropping straight to after-tax cash flow.

That improved cash position is already reshaping decisions that used to be constrained by 280E math -- including whether it makes more sense to keep leasing a facility or buy it outright, now that the tax treatment of the associated costs looks more like a conventional business.

None of this applies if you're recreational-only. Adult-use cannabis businesses with no state medical license tie get zero relief from 280E, because the substance underlying their business is still Schedule I. And even for operators who do qualify, some significant questions remain open: law firm alerts from KMK Law and Foley Hoag both flag unresolved issues around retroactivity, and how the IRS will treat deductions that were disallowed in prior tax years. Nobody should assume this is fully settled yet.

Landlords Are Behind the Curve on What This Means

Photo by Radission US via Unsplash.

Puglise's experience negotiating with landlords tells you a lot about where the market actually is right now, versus where the tax code already is. He says when he raises rescheduling in lease conversations, landlords frequently have no idea what he's talking about. That's not a knock on any particular property owner -- it reflects how fast this moved and how technical the 280E mechanics are for anyone outside the cannabis industry.

The disconnect matters because most commercial landlords still don't connect rescheduling to the fact that a medical cannabis tenant is now, in a very real financial sense, a stronger tenant than they were a year ago. A business that just picked up 15% to 20% in newly deductible rent has meaningfully better free cash flow than it did under the old 280E regime. That's the kind of change that normally shows up in a landlord's underwriting -- but only if the landlord knows to look for it.

This gap creates leverage for operators who understand it. Financial covenants, rent coverage ratios, and security deposit requirements written a year or two ago were calibrated for a tenant operating in a cash-constrained, high-risk category -- essentially pricing in the assumption that cannabis businesses were perpetually thin on margin because federal tax law forced them to be. Tenants now on Schedule III's medical track can make a legitimate case that those terms don't reflect their actual financial position anymore, and they can point to hard numbers to back it up.

Landlords who don't update their assumptions aren't just leaving money on the table in a negotiation -- they risk losing good tenants outright. A well-capitalized medical cannabis operator with genuine leverage now has options, and property owners who are slow to recognize the shift may find that tenant renewing down the street with a landlord who did the homework.

Lease Clauses Worth Rewriting Now

Photo by Mikhail Nilov via Pexels.

Attorney Sally Kent Peebles of Vicente LLP points to personal guarantees as one of the biggest sticking points landlords and tenants are actively rewriting. Personal guarantees became standard practice in cannabis leasing largely because federal illegality made landlords nervous about relying on the corporate entity alone -- if the business got shut down by federal action or simply couldn't survive under 280E's tax burden, landlords wanted a person on the hook, not just an LLC.

That risk calculus looks different now for medical operators with 280E relief and steadier cash flow. Peebles says these tenants increasingly have a legitimate case for swapping a personal guarantee for a corporate one, or at least negotiating a burn-off provision -- language that automatically releases the personal guarantee after a defined stretch of on-time payments, say two or three years. It's a middle-ground structure that gives landlords comfort early in the lease term while giving tenants an exit from personal liability once they've proven they can perform.

Beyond guarantees, there's a pile of boilerplate worth a second look. Older lease templates often bake in representations and warranties around the tenant's federal illegality -- language drafted when every cannabis business, medical or otherwise, was federally unlawful by definition. Some of that language is now simply inaccurate for state-licensed medical tenants and should be updated or struck.

Insurance and certificate-of-occupancy requirements are worth revisiting too, since some were written with Schedule I assumptions about coverage availability and underwriting risk baked in. And permitted-use clauses and financial covenants deserve fresh eyes given the improved after-tax cash flow -- terms that made sense when a tenant's real financial capacity was obscured by disallowed deductions may now be stricter than necessary, or simply outdated.

What to Watch Before Signing Anything

Photo by RDNE Stock project via Pexels.

Anyone drafting or renegotiating a lease right now should resist the urge to treat the current split status as a permanent fixture. Peebles recommends building lease language that anticipates the eventual outcome of the broader rescheduling process, rather than locking in terms based solely on where things stand today.

That's a reasonable instinct given the timeline. DEA hearings on rescheduling cannabis more broadly, including adult-use, concluded July 15, 2026, but no ruling has come out yet. If and when one does, it could extend 280E relief to recreational operators who currently get none of it -- which would reshape the financial profile of adult-use tenants much the way it already has for medical ones. It could also do something else entirely; nobody has a firm timeline or a guaranteed outcome here, and treating any prediction as certain would be a mistake.

Smart lease drafting right now means building in mechanisms that let terms adjust if and when that ruling lands -- rent reviews or covenant recalculations triggered by a change in federal scheduling status, for instance, rather than a lease that's silent on the possibility and has to be reopened entirely later.

It's also worth remembering that cannabis legality and licensing frameworks still vary enormously by state, and rescheduling doesn't override that patchwork. A medical license in one state doesn't necessarily map cleanly onto another state's program, and some states still don't have a functioning medical framework at all. Operators should confirm their specific state's licensing status and legal posture before assuming any of this applies to them, and this isn't legal advice -- it's a reason to get real advice. That means looping in a cannabis-specific attorney and accountant before touching guarantees, covenants, or rent terms, since the interplay between state licensing, federal scheduling, and tax treatment is genuinely intricate and getting it wrong could be costly.

The practical takeaway is that there's no longer a single cannabis lease playbook, if there ever was one. A medical operator with a state license now sits in a fundamentally different financial and legal position than a recreational-only tenant down the hall, even though both were treated identically under federal law a year ago. Lease strategy has to reflect that split, state by state and license by license, rather than treating cannabis real estate as one undifferentiated risk category the way the industry has for the past decade.

Operators who understand what rescheduling actually did -- and did not do -- have leverage they didn't have before, mostly because their landlords haven't caught up yet. That gap won't last forever. As more property owners learn what 280E relief means for a tenant's balance sheet, the easy wins in renegotiation will get harder to find.

The better move for both sides is building flexibility into leases now, while the adult-use ruling is still pending, rather than waiting for the DEA to act and then scrambling to reopen every lease in a portfolio at once. Nobody knows exactly when that ruling comes or what it will say. Leases signed today should be able to bend when it does.