Editorial Standards

// SOURCING, CORRECTIONS, AND DISCLOSURE

Sourcing

We prioritize primary sources: government filings and legislative text, court records, company disclosures, and peer-reviewed or preprint research. Where a story rests on a single outlet's reporting, we say so and link it rather than presenting it as independently confirmed.

How our articles are produced

Draft research and writing on this site are produced with AI assistance as part of our editorial pipeline, combined with human review before publication. This is a factual disclosure, not a caveat on quality: every article is checked against its sources before it goes live, and headlines and claims are held to the same sourcing bar regardless of how the draft was produced.

What we don't do

• We don't accept payment for coverage or placement within an article.
• We don't run ads or affiliate links on Resource Hub pages.
• We don't present a single unconfirmed source as settled fact.
• We don't give dosing, synthesis, or other harm-adjacent instructions dressed up as journalism.

Corrections

When we get something wrong, we fix it and note the correction at the bottom of the article with the date it was made. Material corrections — ones that change the substance of a claim — are noted explicitly rather than silently edited. To flag an error, use Contact with the article URL and what's wrong.

Freshness

Fast-moving stories, particularly around legislation and enforcement, are revisited as facts develop. A "last updated" note appears on articles that have been substantively revised after publication.

This page describes editorial policy for the Cannabis Resource Hub only and is not legal advice. See our product pages for information about items sold on SEEDTIVA.